Book review

A dry tale about a dry time

LAST CALL: THE RISE AND FALL OF PROHIBITIONlast-call200_custom-f4a2f7205ab027a58dd55e6b4eec9d210cbb04c4-s6-c30
Daniel Okrent
Simon & Schuster

I love watching History Channel documentaries on the American Civil War. I’ll scan the electronic program guide and hit record for any Civil War doco I find. If, after pressing play, I realise I’ve seen it already, I’ll watch it again. I’ve seen the well-made but damn slow Ken Burns series at least twice.

This has led to me to believe I have a deep and abiding interest in the Civil War. And so I’ve bought any number of books on the subject – and not finished one of them (well, except for Confederates in the Attic, but that’s more about the US obsession with the war than the war itself). I don’t finish them because, well, they’re boring.

No, that’s not actually true. I just found that I’m not as interested in the Civil War as I thought. Happy to watch docos about the various battles and a bit of voice-over action reading the words of participants, but not at all interested in all the political argy-bargy that went on too.

What’s this got to do with anything? Well, I reckon I feel the same way about Prohibition. Well, at least the way Prohibition is covered in Okrent’s book Last Call. I watched the Ken Burns doco on Prohibition and the idea behind the concept of country banning alcohol. So I bought Okrent’s book, thinking it’d be great. It’s got loads and loads and loads of great reviews – one on the cover even goes so far as to claim it is ‘‘a narrative delight’’. So I figured it’d be the go-to source for Prohibition matters.

I made three separate attempts to read it, always giving up before page 60. In each case it was because it was so damn boring. As for those fantastic reviews, I can only assume they read a different book to me. Or that maybe it becomes an absolute ball-tearer from page 61 (no, I don’t think that actually happens).

For me, the book is really dry and the narrative very slow-moving. The period of prohibition seems rife with great material – crime, mobsters, smugglers, bribery, people partying on regardless, average citizens flouting the law. It’s a story that should really zip along. But Okrent’s tale is so slow. It reads much more like a textbook than a popular history, with Okrent throwing in what seems to be every single piece of research he discovered.

Having tried and failed to read this book three times, I very much doubt I’ll be bothering with a fourth time. At least not until I find myself up in the middle of the night and need to get back to sleep.

It's your shout

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s